North store
spreadsheet- N-101Martínez Landscaping$1,240.00
- N-102Whitfield HVAC$380.00
- N-103Ruiz Bakery$95.50
- N-104Coastal Supply$612.25
The hard part of reporting is almost never drawing the chart. It is getting the numbers from different places to agree on what they mean. We do that part first, then build the report on top of it. Try it below.
Someone builds this report every Friday.
Sample exports from fictional businesses. Switch an export off, or enter the missing amount, and the report rebuilds.
Tap a bar or a customer to see the rows behind it.
One report, built the same way every week. The duplicate is gone, the names match, and the blank order waited for a person.
A report is only useful if someone can challenge a figure and get a straight answer. These are the four properties that make that possible, and they are worth more than any amount of visual polish.
Written down in plain language: what counts, what is excluded, and as of when. Agreed with you before it is built, not inferred afterwards.
Any figure can be followed back to the source records that produced it, so a disagreement is a question with an answer rather than an argument.
Refreshed on a stated schedule, with the timestamp visible. A dashboard that does not say how fresh it is invites people to assume the worst.
It agrees with the systems of record where it should, and where it deliberately differs, that difference is documented rather than discovered.
We would rather ship a plain report that survives scrutiny than a polished dashboard nobody trusts twice. If the underlying definitions cannot be agreed, we will say that is the blocker rather than building on top of it.
Tell us the figure that changes depending on who produces it. We will find out why, agree what it should mean, and come back with a scope and a number.
A reporting engagement covers the sources, figures, and outputs we agreed on. These boundaries come from our Terms of Service and apply to every technology engagement.
Reporting exposes data-quality problems rather than fixing them: if two systems genuinely disagree because one of them holds bad records, consolidating them makes that visible but does not repair it. Cleanup is real work and is quoted separately when it is needed.
Work is priced by scope, not by the hour. You get a written scope with a fixed price before anything starts, and larger builds are split into milestones. The ranges below show where engagements typically start. Note that warehouse and BI platform costs continue for as long as the reporting runs.
| Engagement | When it fits | Investment |
|---|---|---|
| Fit Check | You know the work hurts, but not yet what to build, or whether to build anything: 30 minutes to find out. | Free |
| Quick Win Automation | One tightly bounded problem with a clear finish line. | From $1,500 |
| Core Automation or Integration Build | Workflows and system connections the business runs on, priced in a written scope. | From $5,000 |
| Operations Automation Partnership | After a build: monitoring, maintenance, vendor and API changes, and small improvements. | From $750 / month |
| Third-party costs | Warehouse, BI platform, and query or storage charges, which continue while it runs. | Customer-paid directly |
Your first payment is due before work starts, and each later payment when your written scope sets it. Final files, credentials and the handoff may be held until everything due is paid. If we find the actual scope differs materially from what was described, we stop and give you a revised estimate before doing the additional work.
Hosting, domains, licenses, subscriptions, and processing fees stay in accounts you own and are billed to you directly by each vendor whenever practical. Where we must place an approved charge on your behalf, that amount is collected before we incur it.
Every build ends with documentation and a handoff, so your team can run it. If you would rather not, a monthly partnership covers monitoring, vendor and API changes, and small improvements under its own written agreement.
See Partnership LevelsYou agree to review deliverables promptly. Unless we agree to a different acceptance method in writing, work is deemed accepted on the earliest of: your written approval; your use of the delivered work in production or public release; or five (5) business days after delivery without a written, reasonably specific objection tied to the agreed scope.
T&C Group Holdings, LLC is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Technology services are provided for implementation, support, troubleshooting, and general business-use guidance only. Reports and dashboards present the data supplied by your systems according to the definitions agreed with you; we do not independently verify that source data is accurate, complete, or lawful, and we do not provide financial, accounting, tax, or investment advice or interpretation. Business decisions made on the basis of any report remain yours. We do not guarantee uptime, compatibility with every third-party service, or any particular business or technical outcome. Ongoing maintenance, monitoring, and support are outside a standard engagement unless separately accepted in writing. This page is a summary for convenience; our Terms of Service govern.
Full terms: Terms of Service